Concept Map Assessments
What is a Concept Map?
A concept map is a hierarchical form of structure diagram that illustrates conceptual knowledge and
their relationships within a specific topic from general to specific concepts. It consists of concept
labels (aka nodes, cells) which are connected together by lines, these lines are labeled with directions.
A concept map is often known as a flow chart, it is widely used in business to gain an insight on the
overview and for brain-storming new ideas and developments.
Concept map was developed by Joseph Novak based on the cognitive theories of David Ausubel
(Assimilation Theory) who stressed the importance of prior knowledge in order to gain deep learning
on new concepts. So by understanding what you already knew, and relating new concepts to what you
knew, meaningful deep learning can easily occur.
The core element of a concept map is a proposition, which consists of two or more concepts connected by a labeled link. These propositions are then branched out to form a larger structure that provides the whole picture.
By understanding the whole picture, how each concept is related and sub-related to each other which
are illustrated in a hierarchical framework, learners will find deep learning.
Y | Declarative | |
Y | Functioning | |
Take Time to Set | ||
Take Time to Answer | ||
Take Time to Correct | ||
Take Time to provide Feedback | ||
Y | Suitable for Large Class | |
Y | Can substitute with Computers | |
Passive | ||
Y | Active | |
Y | Process Oriented Method | |
Y | Product Oriented Method | |
P = Possibly Y =Yes |
Marking Rubrics
Below is a sample of the marking rubrics and grading standards for a concept mapping assessment:
MARKING RUBRICS | Excellent | Proficient | Average | Poor |
Organisation: |
Well organised Provides a very clear big picture of the ideas Contains main concepts Contains an appropriate number of concepts Follows standard map conventions Concepts are short and clear |
Thoughtfully organized Provides a big picture of the ideas Contains most of the main concepts Contains an adequate number of concepts Follows the standard map conventions Concepts are clear |
Somewhat organized Provides a picture of the ideas Somewhat incoherent Contains only a few of the main concepts |
Choppy and confusing Provides a scattered picture of some ideas Contains a limited number of concepts |
Links: |
Links are precisely labeled Simple and complex relationships are mapped effectively |
Links are labeled Relationships are mapped |
Links are not labeled Some ideas, concepts are linked but not distinctive |
No links Difficult to follow relationships |
Thinking and Ideas: |
Includes concepts that are extremely suitable for the topic and that show original or creative thinking All ideas, themes, theories and framework are well thought-full |
Most or all concepts are suitable for the topic Some ideas, themes, theories and framework are thought-full |
Most concepts satisfy the basic requirements for the topic, but some do not directly relate to the topic Adequate ideas, theories and framework are thought-full although not clearly shown |
|
Communication: | Clearly presented, high level of understanding | Clearly presented, good level of understanding | Information is presented but more understanding can be gained |
|
Teamwork: |
Worked extremely well with each Respected and complemented each others ideas |
Worked very well with each other Worked to get everyone involved |
Attempted to work well with others At times 'off task' and not everyone was actively involved |
Little or no teamwork |
Copy and paste the text below:
Chan C.(2008) Assessment: Concept Map, Assessment Resources@HKU, University of Hong Kong [http://ar.talic.hku.hk]: Available: Accessed: DATE